Cost / 100k coverage
$168
Total premium over term
$8,400
Coverage / annual premium
595×
Insurance & Protection Tools
Compare several premium and coverage options, normalize cost per unit of protection and inspect how much extra premium is required when moving to a higher coverage level.
Premium / coverage analysis
Compare several coverage options, normalize annual premium per 100,000 units of coverage and inspect the marginal premium paid when moving to the next coverage level.
Options
3
Lowest cost / 100k
Option C · $124
Highest coverage
Option C · $750,000
Coverage range
$250,000 → $750,000
Options are automatically sorted by coverage in the analysis below.
Cost / 100k coverage
$168
Total premium over term
$8,400
Coverage / annual premium
595×
Cost / 100k coverage
$138
Total premium over term
$13,800
Coverage / annual premium
725×
Cost / 100k coverage
$124
Total premium over term
$18,600
Coverage / annual premium
806×
This section compares each coverage level with the next higher one. It helps show whether the percentage increase in premium is greater or smaller than the percentage increase in coverage.
Option A → Option B
$250,000 → $500,000
Extra coverage
$250,000
Extra annual premium
$270
Premium per extra 100k
$108
Coverage increase
100.0%
Premium increase
64.3%
Option B → Option C
$500,000 → $750,000
Extra coverage
$250,000
Extra annual premium
$240
Premium per extra 100k
$96
Coverage increase
50.0%
Premium increase
34.8%
| Option | Coverage | Annual premium | Cost / 100k | Term | Total premium |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Option ASample | $250,000 | $420 | $168 | 20 yrs | $8,400 |
| Option BSample | $500,000 | $690 | $138 | 20 yrs | $13,800 |
| Option CSample | $750,000 | $930 | $124 | 20 yrs | $18,600 |
Keep the comparison
Save the mathematics as CSV, a printable report or a reusable local FormatForge project file.
Sample coverage options loaded.
A lower premium per unit of coverage or a favorable marginal ratio does not make an insurance option better. Coverage definitions, exclusions, riders, underwriting, claims terms, renewability and policy wording can materially differ.
Normalize different coverage levels
If one option provides twice the coverage, a higher premium may still have a lower cost per unit of protection. Normalized cost makes that arithmetic visible without implying that the policy itself is better.
Marginal comparison
The marginal view compares neighboring coverage levels and shows whether coverage grows faster or slower than premium. This can make a set of quotes easier to understand before reviewing the actual terms.
For each option it calculates annual premium, coverage, annual cost per 100,000 units of coverage, total premium over the entered term and the coverage-to-premium ratio.
When options are sorted by coverage, the tool compares each option with the next higher one. It shows the extra premium paid for the extra coverage and the premium cost per additional 100,000 units of protection.
No. The calculator only compares entered mathematics. Coverage definitions, riders, exclusions, underwriting, claims terms and policy wording can differ significantly.
Sorting makes it possible to compare how much additional premium is required when moving from one coverage level to the next.
Yes. The workspace supports up to eight premium/coverage options in one comparison.
Yes. You can copy the summary, export CSV, print/save a PDF-style report, or save a local FormatForge project file and restore it later.
Insurance comparison workflow
After comparing premium/coverage options, use the full Policy Comparison Workspace to capture riders, exclusions, waiting periods and policy notes.